Decision boundary of semi-supervised classifiers versus SVM on the Iris dataset

A comparison for the decision boundaries generated on the iris dataset by Label Spreading, Self-training and SVM.

This example demonstrates that Label Spreading and Self-training can learn good boundaries even when small amounts of labeled data are available.

Note that Self-training with 100% of the data is omitted as it is functionally identical to training the SVC on 100% of the data.

Unlabeled points are colored white, Label Spreading 30% data, Self-training 30% data, Label Spreading 50% data, Self-training 50% data, Label Spreading 100% data, SVC with rbf kernel
print(__doc__)

# Authors: Clay Woolam   <[email protected]>
#          Oliver Rausch <[email protected]>
# License: BSD

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from sklearn.semi_supervised import LabelSpreading
from sklearn.semi_supervised import SelfTrainingClassifier


iris = datasets.load_iris()

X = iris.data[:, :2]
y = iris.target

# step size in the mesh
h = .02

rng = np.random.RandomState(0)
y_rand = rng.rand(y.shape[0])
y_30 = np.copy(y)
y_30[y_rand < 0.3] = -1  # set random samples to be unlabeled
y_50 = np.copy(y)
y_50[y_rand < 0.5] = -1
# we create an instance of SVM and fit out data. We do not scale our
# data since we want to plot the support vectors
ls30 = (LabelSpreading().fit(X, y_30), y_30, 'Label Spreading 30% data')
ls50 = (LabelSpreading().fit(X, y_50), y_50, 'Label Spreading 50% data')
ls100 = (LabelSpreading().fit(X, y), y, 'Label Spreading 100% data')

# the base classifier for self-training is identical to the SVC
base_classifier = SVC(kernel='rbf', gamma=.5, probability=True)
st30 = (SelfTrainingClassifier(base_classifier).fit(X, y_30),
        y_30, 'Self-training 30% data')
st50 = (SelfTrainingClassifier(base_classifier).fit(X, y_50),
        y_50, 'Self-training 50% data')

rbf_svc = (SVC(kernel='rbf', gamma=.5).fit(X, y), y, 'SVC with rbf kernel')

# create a mesh to plot in
x_min, x_max = X[:, 0].min() - 1, X[:, 0].max() + 1
y_min, y_max = X[:, 1].min() - 1, X[:, 1].max() + 1
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.arange(x_min, x_max, h),
                     np.arange(y_min, y_max, h))

color_map = {-1: (1, 1, 1), 0: (0, 0, .9), 1: (1, 0, 0), 2: (.8, .6, 0)}

classifiers = (ls30, st30, ls50, st50, ls100, rbf_svc)
for i, (clf, y_train, title) in enumerate(classifiers):
    # Plot the decision boundary. For that, we will assign a color to each
    # point in the mesh [x_min, x_max]x[y_min, y_max].
    plt.subplot(3, 2, i + 1)
    Z = clf.predict(np.c_[xx.ravel(), yy.ravel()])

    # Put the result into a color plot
    Z = Z.reshape(xx.shape)
    plt.contourf(xx, yy, Z, cmap=plt.cm.Paired)
    plt.axis('off')

    # Plot also the training points
    colors = [color_map[y] for y in y_train]
    plt.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=colors, edgecolors='black')

    plt.title(title)

plt.suptitle("Unlabeled points are colored white", y=0.1)
plt.show()

Total running time of the script: ( 0 minutes 3.119 seconds)

© 2007–2020 The scikit-learn developers
Licensed under the 3-clause BSD License.
https://scikit-learn.org/0.24/auto_examples/semi_supervised/plot_semi_supervised_versus_svm_iris.html