torch.fx
Overview
This feature is under a Beta release and its API may change.
FX is a toolkit for developers to use to transform nn.Module
instances. FX consists of three main components: a symbolic tracer, an intermediate representation, and Python code generation. A demonstration of these components in action:
import torch # Simple module for demonstration class MyModule(torch.nn.Module): def __init__(self): super().__init__() self.param = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.rand(3, 4)) self.linear = torch.nn.Linear(4, 5) def forward(self, x): return self.linear(x + self.param).clamp(min=0.0, max=1.0) module = MyModule() from torch.fx import symbolic_trace # Symbolic tracing frontend - captures the semantics of the module symbolic_traced : torch.fx.GraphModule = symbolic_trace(module) # High-level intermediate representation (IR) - Graph representation print(symbolic_traced.graph) """ graph(x): %param : [#users=1] = self.param %add_1 : [#users=1] = call_function[target=<built-in function add>](args = (%x, %param), kwargs = {}) %linear_1 : [#users=1] = call_module[target=linear](args = (%add_1,), kwargs = {}) %clamp_1 : [#users=1] = call_method[target=clamp](args = (%linear_1,), kwargs = {min: 0.0, max: 1.0}) return clamp_1 """ # Code generation - valid Python code print(symbolic_traced.code) """ def forward(self, x): param = self.param add_1 = x + param; x = param = None linear_1 = self.linear(add_1); add_1 = None clamp_1 = linear_1.clamp(min = 0.0, max = 1.0); linear_1 = None return clamp_1 """
The symbolic tracer performs “symbolic execution” of the Python code. It feeds fake values, called Proxies, through the code. Operations on theses Proxies are recorded. More information about symbolic tracing can be found in the symbolic_trace()
and Tracer
documentation.
The intermediate representation is the container for the operations that were recorded during symbolic tracing. It consists of a list of Nodes that represent function inputs, callsites (to functions, methods, or torch.nn.Module
instances), and return values. More information about the IR can be found in the documentation for Graph
. The IR is the format on which transformations are applied.
Python code generation is what makes FX a Python-to-Python (or Module-to-Module) transformation toolkit. For each Graph IR, we can create valid Python code matching the Graph’s semantics. This functionality is wrapped up in GraphModule
, which is a torch.nn.Module
instance that holds a Graph
as well as a forward
method generated from the Graph.
Taken together, this pipeline of components (symbolic tracing → intermediate representation → transforms → Python code generation) constitutes the Python-to-Python transformation pipeline of FX. In addition, these components can be used separately. For example, symbolic tracing can be used in isolation to capture a form of the code for analysis (and not transformation) purposes. Code generation can be used for programmatically generating models, for example from a config file. There are many uses for FX!
Several example transformations can be found at the examples repository.
Writing Transformations
What is an FX transform? Essentially, it’s a function that looks like this.
import torch import torch.fx def transform(m: nn.Module, tracer_class : type = torch.fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module: # Step 1: Acquire a Graph representing the code in `m` # NOTE: torch.fx.symbolic_trace is a wrapper around a call to # fx.Tracer.trace and constructing a GraphModule. We'll # split that out in our transform to allow the caller to # customize tracing behavior. graph : torch.fx.Graph = tracer_class().trace(m) # Step 2: Modify this Graph or create a new one graph = ... # Step 3: Construct a Module to return return torch.fx.GraphModule(m, graph)
Your transform will take in an torch.nn.Module
, acquire a Graph
from it, do some modifications, and return a new torch.nn.Module
. You should think of the torch.nn.Module
that your FX transform returns as identical to a regular torch.nn.Module
– you can pass it to another FX transform, you can pass it to TorchScript, or you can run it. Ensuring that the inputs and outputs of your FX transform are a torch.nn.Module
will allow for composability.
Note
It is also possible to modify an existing GraphModule
instead of creating a new one, like so:
import torch import torch.fx def transform(m : nn.Module) -> nn.Module): gm : torch.fx.GraphModule = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(m) # Modify gm.graph # <...> # Recompile the forward() method of `gm` from its Graph gm.recompile() return gm
Note that you MUST call GraphModule.recompile()
to bring the generated forward()
method on the GraphModule
in sync with the modified Graph
.
Given that you’ve passed in a torch.nn.Module
that has been traced into a Graph
, there are now two primary approaches you can take to building a new Graph
.
A Quick Primer on Graphs
Full treatment of the semantics of graphs can be found in the Graph
documentation, but we are going to cover the basics here. A Graph
is a data structure that represents a method on a GraphModule
. The information that this requires is:
- What are the inputs to the method?
- What are the operations that run inside the method?
- What is the output (i.e. return) value from the method?
All three of these concepts are represented with Node
instances. Let’s see what we mean by that with a short example:
import torch import torch.fx class MyModule(torch.nn.Module): def __init__(self): super().__init__() self.param = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.rand(3, 4)) self.linear = torch.nn.Linear(4, 5) def forward(self, x): return torch.topk(torch.sum( self.linear(x + self.linear.weight).relu(), dim=-1), 3) m = MyModule() gm = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(m) gm.graph.print_tabular()
Here we define a module MyModule
for demonstration purposes, instantiate it, symbolically trace it, then call the Graph.print_tabular()
method to print out a table showing the nodes of this Graph
:
opcode | name | target | args | kwargs |
---|---|---|---|---|
placeholder | x | x | () | {} |
get_attr | linear_weight | linear.weight | () | {} |
call_function | add_1 | <built-in function add> | (x, linear_weight) | {} |
call_module | linear_1 | linear | (add_1,) | {} |
call_method | relu_1 | relu | (linear_1,) | {} |
call_function | sum_1 | <built-in method sum …> | (relu_1,) | {‘dim’: -1} |
call_function | topk_1 | <built-in method topk …> | (sum_1, 3) | {} |
output | output | output | (topk_1,) | {} |
We can use this information to answer the questions we posed above.
- What are the inputs to the method? In FX, method inputs are specified via special
placeholder
nodes. In this case, we have a singleplaceholder
node with atarget
ofx
, meaning we have a single (non-self) argument named x. - What are the operations within the method? The
get_attr
,call_function
,call_module
, andcall_method
nodes represent the operations in the method. A full treatment of the semantics of all of these can be found in theNode
documentation. - What is the return value of the method? The return value in a
Graph
is specified by a specialoutput
node.
Given that we now know the basics of how code is represented in FX, we can now explore how we would edit a Graph
.
Graph Manipulation
Direct Graph Manipulation
One approach to building this new Graph
is to directly manipulate your old one. To aid in this, we can simply take the Graph
we obtain from symbolic tracing and modify it. For example, let’s say we desire to replace torch.add()
calls with torch.mul()
calls.
import torch import torch.fx # Sample module class M(torch.nn.Module): def forward(self, x, y): return torch.add(x, y) def transform(m: torch.nn.Module, tracer_class : type = fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module: graph : fx.Graph = tracer_class().trace(m) # FX represents its Graph as an ordered list of # nodes, so we can iterate through them. for node in graph.nodes: # Checks if we're calling a function (i.e: # torch.add) if node.op == 'call_function': # The target attribute is the function # that call_function calls. if node.target == torch.add: node.target = torch.mul graph.lint() # Does some checks to make sure the # Graph is well-formed. return fx.GraphModule(m, graph)
We can also do more involved Graph
rewrites, such as deleting or appending nodes. To aid in these transformations, FX has utility functions for transforming the graph that can be found in the Graph
documentation. An example of using these APIs to append a torch.relu()
call can be found below.
# Specifies the insertion point. Any nodes added to the # Graph within this scope will be inserted after `node` with traced.graph.inserting_after(node): # Insert a new `call_function` node calling `torch.relu` new_node = traced.graph.call_function( torch.relu, args=(node,)) # We want all places that used the value of `node` to # now use that value after the `relu` call we've added. # We use the `replace_all_uses_with` API to do this. node.replace_all_uses_with(new_node)
For simple transformations that only consist of substitutions, you can also make use of the subgraph rewriter.
Subgraph Rewriting With replace_pattern()
FX also provides another level of automation on top of direct graph manipulation. The replace_pattern()
API is essentially a “find/replace” tool for editing Graph
s. It allows you to specify a pattern
and replacement
function and it will trace through those functions, find instances of the group of operations in the pattern
graph, and replace those instances with copies of the replacement
graph. This can help to greatly automate tedious graph manipulation code, which can get unwieldy as the transformations get more complex.
Graph Manipulation Examples
- Replace one op
- Conv/Batch Norm fusion
- replace_pattern: Basic usage
- Quantization
- Invert Transformation
Proxy/Retracing
Another way of manipulating Graph
s is by reusing the Proxy
machinery used in symbolic tracing. For example, let’s imagine that we wanted to write a transformation that decomposed PyTorch functions into smaller operations. It would transform every F.relu(x)
call into (x > 0) * x
. One possibility would be to perform the requisite graph rewriting to insert the comparison and multiplication after the F.relu
, and then clean up the original F.relu
. However, we can automate this process by using Proxy
objects to automatically record operations into the Graph
.
To use this method, we write the operations that we want inserted as regular PyTorch code and invoke that code with Proxy
objects as arugments. These Proxy
objects will capture the operations that are performed on them and append them to the Graph
.
# Note that this decomposition rule can be read as regular Python def relu_decomposition(x): return (x > 0) * x decomposition_rules = {} decomposition_rules[F.relu] = relu_decomposition def decompose(model: torch.nn.Module, tracer_class : type = fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module: """ Decompose `model` into smaller constituent operations. Currently,this only supports decomposing ReLU into its mathematical definition: (x > 0) * x """ graph : fx.Graph = tracer_class().trace(model) new_graph = fx.Graph() env = {} for node in graph.nodes: if node.op == 'call_function' and node.target in decomposition_rules: # By wrapping the arguments with proxies, # we can dispatch to the appropriate # decomposition rule and implicitly add it # to the Graph by symbolically tracing it. proxy_args = [ fx.Proxy(env[x.name]) if isinstance(x, fx.Node) else x for x in node.args] output_proxy = decomposition_rules[node.target](*proxy_args) # Operations on `Proxy` always yield new `Proxy`s, and the # return value of our decomposition rule is no exception. # We need to extract the underlying `Node` from the `Proxy` # to use it in subsequent iterations of this transform. new_node = output_proxy.node env[node.name] = new_node else: # Default case: we don't have a decomposition rule for this # node, so just copy the node over into the new graph. new_node = new_graph.node_copy(node, lambda x: env[x.name]) env[node.name] = new_node return fx.GraphModule(model, new_graph)
In addition to avoiding explicit graph manipulation, using Proxy
s also allows you to specify your rewrite rules as native Python code. For transformations that require a large amount of rewrite rules (such as vmap or grad), this can often improve readability and maintainability of the rules.
A worked example of using Proxy
s for Graph
manipulation can be found here.
The Interpreter Pattern
A useful code organizational pattern in FX is to loop over all the Node
s in a Graph
and execute them. This can be used for several things including runtime analysis of values flowing through the graph or transformation of the code via retracing with Proxy
s. For example, suppose we want to run a GraphModule
and record the torch.Tensor
shape and dtype properties on the nodes as we see them at runtime. That might look like:
import torch import torch.fx from torch.fx.node import Node from typing import Dict class ShapeProp: """ Shape propagation. This class takes a `GraphModule`. Then, its `propagate` method executes the `GraphModule` node-by-node with the given arguments. As each operation executes, the ShapeProp class stores away the shape and element type for the output values of each operation on the `shape` and `dtype` attributes of the operation's `Node`. """ def __init__(self, mod): self.mod = mod self.graph = mod.graph self.modules = dict(self.mod.named_modules()) def propagate(self, *args): args_iter = iter(args) env : Dict[str, Node] = {} def load_arg(a): return torch.fx.graph.map_arg(a, lambda n: env[n.name]) def fetch_attr(target : str): target_atoms = target.split('.') attr_itr = self.mod for i, atom in enumerate(target_atoms): if not hasattr(attr_itr, atom): raise RuntimeError(f"Node referenced nonexistant target {'.'.join(target_atoms[:i])}") attr_itr = getattr(attr_itr, atom) return attr_itr for node in self.graph.nodes: if node.op == 'placeholder': result = next(args_iter) elif node.op == 'get_attr': result = fetch_attr(node.target) elif node.op == 'call_function': result = node.target(*load_arg(node.args), **load_arg(node.kwargs)) elif node.op == 'call_method': self_obj, *args = load_arg(node.args) kwargs = load_arg(node.kwargs) result = getattr(self_obj, node.target)(*args, **kwargs) elif node.op == 'call_module': result = self.modules[node.target](*load_arg(node.args), **load_arg(node.kwargs)) # This is the only code specific to shape propagation. # you can delete this `if` branch and this becomes # a generic GraphModule interpreter. if isinstance(result, torch.Tensor): node.shape = result.shape node.dtype = result.dtype env[node.name] = result return load_arg(self.graph.result)
As you can see, a full interpreter for FX is not that complicated but it can be very useful. To ease using this pattern, we provide the Interpreter
class, which encompasses the above logic in a way that certain aspects of the interpreter’s execution can be overridden via method overrides.
In addition to executing operations, we can also generate a new Graph
by feeding Proxy
values through an interpreter. Similarly, we provide the Transformer
class to encompass this pattern. Transformer
behaves similarly to Interpreter
, but instead of calling the run
method to get a concrete output value from the Module, you would call the Transformer.transform()
method to return a new GraphModule
which was subject to any transformation rules you installed as overridden methods.
Examples of the Interpreter Pattern
Debugging
Introduction
Often in the course of authoring transformations, our code will not be quite right. In this case, we may need to do some debugging. The key is to work backwards: first, check the results of invoking the generated module to prove or disprove correctness. Then, inspect and debug the generated code. Then, debug the process of transformations that led to the generated code.
If you’re not familiar with debuggers, please see the auxiliary section Available Debuggers.
Checking Correctness of Modules
Because the output of most deep learning modules consists of floating point torch.Tensor
instances, checking for equivalence between the results of two torch.nn.Module
is not as straightforward as doing a simple equality check. To motivate this, let’s use an example:
import torch import torch.fx import torchvision.models as models def transform(m : torch.nn.Module) -> torch.nn.Module: gm = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(m) # Imagine we're doing some transforms here # <...> gm.recompile() return gm resnet18 = models.resnet18() transformed_resnet18 = transform(resnet18) input_image = torch.randn(5, 3, 224, 224) assert resnet18(input_image) == transformed_resnet18(input_image) """ RuntimeError: Boolean value of Tensor with more than one value is ambiguous """
Here, we’ve tried to check equality of the values of two deep learning models with the ==
equality operator. However, this is not well- defined both due to the issue of that operator returning a tensor and not a bool, but also because comparison of floating point values should use a margin of error (or epsilon) to account for the non-commutativity of floating point operations (see here for more details). We can use torch.allclose()
instead, which will give us an approximate comparison taking into account a relative and absolute tolerance threshold:
assert torch.allclose(resnet18(input_image), transformed_resnet18(input_image))
This is the first tool in our toolbox to check if transformed modules are behaving as we expect compared to a reference implementation.
Debugging the Generated Code
Because FX generates the forward()
function on GraphModule
s, using traditional debugging techniques like print
statements or pdb
is not as straightfoward. Luckily, we have several techniques we can use for debugging the generated code.
Use pdb
Invoke pdb
to step into the running program. Although the code that represents the Graph
is not in any source file, we can still step into it manually using pdb
when the forward pass is invoked.
import torch import torch.fx import torchvision.models as models def my_pass(inp: torch.nn.Module, tracer_class : type = fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module: graph = tracer_class().trace(inp) # Transformation logic here # <...> # Return new Module return fx.GraphModule(inp, graph) my_module = models.resnet18() my_module_transformed = my_pass(my_module) input_value = torch.randn(5, 3, 224, 224) # When this line is executed at runtime, we will be dropped into an # interactive `pdb` prompt. We can use the `step` or `s` command to # step into the execution of the next line import pdb; pdb.set_trace() my_module_transformed(input_value)
Print the Generated Code
If you’d like to run the same code multiple times, then it can be a bit tedious to step to the right code with pdb
. In that case, one approach is to simply copy-paste the generated forward
pass into your code and examine it from there.
# Assume that `traced` is a GraphModule that has undergone some # number of transforms # Copy this code for later print(traced) # Print the code generated from symbolic tracing. This outputs: """ def forward(self, y): x = self.x add_1 = x + y; x = y = None return add_1 """ # Subclass the original Module class SubclassM(M): def __init__(self): super().__init__() # Paste the generated `forward` function (the one we printed and # copied above) here def forward(self, y): x = self.x add_1 = x + y; x = y = None return add_1 # Create an instance of the original, untraced Module. Then, create an # instance of the Module with the copied `forward` function. We can # now compare the output of both the original and the traced version. pre_trace = M() post_trace = SubclassM()
Use the to_folder
Function From GraphModule
GraphModule.to_folder()
is a method in GraphModule
that allows you to dump out the generated FX code to a folder. Although copying the forward pass into the code often suffices as in Print the Generated Code, it may be easier to examine modules and parameters using to_folder
.
m = symbolic_trace(M()) m.to_folder("foo", "Bar") from foo import Bar y = Bar()
After running the above example, we can then look at the code within foo/module.py
and modify it as desired (e.g. adding print
statements or using pdb
) to debug the generated code.
Debugging the Transformation
Now that we’ve identified that a transformation is creating incorrect code, it’s time to debug the transformation itself. First, we’ll check the Limitations of Symbolic Tracing section in the documentation. Once we verify that tracing is working as expected, the goal becomes figuring out what went wrong during our GraphModule
transformation. There may be a quick answer in Writing Transformations, but, if not, there are several ways to examine our traced module:
# Sample Module class M(torch.nn.Module): def forward(self, x, y): return x + y # Create an instance of `M` m = M() # Symbolically trace an instance of `M` (returns a GraphModule). In # this example, we'll only be discussing how to inspect a # GraphModule, so we aren't showing any sample transforms for the # sake of brevity. traced = symbolic_trace(m) # Print the code produced by tracing the module. print(traced) # The generated `forward` function is: """ def forward(self, x, y): add_1 = x + y; x = y = None return add_1 """ # Print the internal Graph. print(traced.graph) # This print-out returns: """ graph(x, y): %add_1 : [#users=1] = call_function[target=<built-in function add>](args = (%x, %y), kwargs = {}) return add_1 """ # Print a tabular representation of the internal Graph. traced.graph.print_tabular() # This gives us: """ opcode name target args kwargs ------------- ------ ----------------------- -------- -------- placeholder x x () {} placeholder y y () {} call_function add_1 <built-in function add> (x, y) {} """
Using the utility functions above, we can compare our traced Module before and after we’ve applied our transformations. Sometimes, a simple visual comparison is enough to trace down a bug. If it’s still not clear what’s going wrong, a debugger like pdb
can be a good next step.
Going off of the example above, consider the following code:
# Sample user-defined function def transform_graph(module: torch.nn.Module, tracer_class : type = fx.Tracer) -> torch.nn.Module: # Get the Graph from our traced Module g = tracer_class().trace(module) """ Transformations on `g` go here """ return fx.GraphModule(module, g) # Transform the Graph transformed = transform_graph(traced) # Print the new code after our transforms. Check to see if it was # what we expected print(transformed)
Using the above example, let’s say that the call to print(traced)
showed us that there was an error in our transforms. We want to find what goes wrong using a debugger. We start a pdb
session. We can see what’s happening during the transform by breaking on transform_graph(traced)
, then pressing s
to “step into” the call to transform_graph(traced)
.
We may also have good luck by editing the print_tabular
method to print different attributes of the Nodes in the Graph. (For example, we might want to see the Node’s input_nodes
and users
.)
Available Debuggers
The most common Python debugger is pdb. You can start your program in “debug mode” with pdb
by typing python -m pdb FILENAME.py
into the command line, where FILENAME
is the name of the file you want to debug. After that, you can use the pdb
debugger commands to move through your running program stepwise. It’s common to set a breakpoint (b LINE-NUMBER
) when you start pdb
, then call c
to run the program until that point. This prevents you from having to step through each line of execution (using s
or n
) to get to the part of the code you want to examine. Alternatively, you can write import pdb; pdb.set_trace()
before the line you want to break at. If you add pdb.set_trace()
, your program will automatically start in debug mode when you run it. (In other words, you can just type python FILENAME.py
into the command line instead of python -m pdb FILENAME.py
.) Once you’re running your file in debug mode, you can step through the code and examine your program’s internal state using certain commands. There are many excellent tutorials on pdb
online, including RealPython’s “Python Debugging With Pdb”.
IDEs like PyCharm or VSCode usually have a debugger built in. In your IDE, you can choose to either a) use pdb
by pulling up a terminal window in your IDE (e.g. View → Terminal in VSCode), or b) use the built-in debugger (usually a graphical wrapper around pdb
).
Limitations of Symbolic Tracing
FX uses a system of symbolic tracing (a.k.a symbolic execution) to capture the semantics of programs in a transformable/analyzable form. The system is tracing in that it executes the program (really a torch.nn.Module
or function) to record operations. It is symbolic in that the data flowing through the program during this execution is not real data, but rather symbols (Proxy
in FX parlance).
Although symbolic tracing works for most neural net code, it has some limitations.
Dynamic Control Flow
The main limitation of symbolic tracing is it does not currently support dynamic control flow. That is, loops or if
statements where the condition may depend on the input values of the program.
For example, let’s examine the following program:
def func_to_trace(x): dim0 = x.size[0] if dim0 == 3: return torch.relu(x) else: return torch.neg(x) traced = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(func_to_trace) """ <...> File "dyn.py", line 6, in func_to_trace if dim0 == 3: File "pytorch/torch/fx/proxy.py", line 155, in __bool__ return self.tracer.to_bool(self) File "pytorch/torch/fx/proxy.py", line 85, in to_bool raise TraceError('symbolically traced variables cannot be used as inputs to control flow') torch.fx.proxy.TraceError: symbolically traced variables cannot be used as inputs to control flow """
The condition to the if
statement relies on the value of dim0
, which eventually relies on the value of x
, a function input. Since x
can change (i.e. if you pass a new input tensor to the traced function), this is dynamic control flow. The traceback walks back up through your code to show you where this situation happens.
Static Control Flow
On the other hand, so-called static control flow is supported. Static control flow is loops or if
statements whose value cannot change across invocations. Typically, in PyTorch programs, this control flow arises for code making decisions about a model’s architecture based on hyper-parameters. As a concrete example:
import torch import torch.fx class MyModule(torch.nn.Module): def __init__(self, do_activation : bool = False): super().__init__() self.do_activation = do_activation self.linear = torch.nn.Linear(512, 512) def forward(self, x): x = self.linear(x) # This if-statement is so-called static control flow. # Its condition does not depend on any input values if self.do_activation: x = torch.relu(x) return x without_activation = MyModule(do_activation=False) with_activation = MyModule(do_activation=True) traced_without_activation = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(without_activation) print(traced_without_activation.code) """ def forward(self, x): linear_1 = self.linear(x); x = None return linear_1 """ traced_with_activation = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(with_activation) print(traced_with_activation.code) """ import torch def forward(self, x): linear_1 = self.linear(x); x = None relu_1 = torch.relu(linear_1); linear_1 = None return relu_1 """
The if-statement if self.do_activation
does not depend on any function inputs, thus it is static. do_activation
can be considered to be a hyper-parameter, and the traces of different instances of MyModule
with different values for that parameter have different code. This is a valid pattern that is supported by symbolic tracing.
Many instances of dynamic control flow are semantically static control flow. These instances can be made to support symbolic tracing by removing the data dependencies on input values, for example by moving values to Module
attributes or by passing constant values during symbolic tracing:
def f(x, flag): if flag: return x else: return x*2 fx.symbolic_trace(f) # Fails! def wrapper(flag): return lambda x: f(x, flag) new_f = wrapper(flag=True) fx.symbolic_trace(new_f)
In the case of truly dynamic control flow, the sections of the program that contain this code can be traced as calls to the Method (see Customizing Tracing with the Tracer class) or function (see wrap()
) rather than tracing through them.
Non-torch
Functions
FX uses __torch_function__
as the mechanism by which it intercepts calls (see the technical overview for more information about this). Some functions, such as builtin Python functions or those in the math
module, are things that are not covered by __torch_function__
, but we would still like to capture them in symbolic tracing. For example:
import torch import torch.fx from math import sqrt def normalize(x): """ Normalize `x` by the size of the batch dimension """ return x / sqrt(len(x)) # It's valid Python code normalize(torch.rand(3, 4)) traced = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(normalize) """ <...> File "sqrt.py", line 9, in normalize return x / sqrt(len(x)) File "pytorch/torch/fx/proxy.py", line 161, in __len__ raise RuntimeError("'len' is not supported in symbolic tracing by default. If you want " RuntimeError: 'len' is not supported in symbolic tracing by default. If you want this call to be recorded, please call torch.fx.wrap('len') at module scope """
The error tells us that the built-in function len
is not supported. We can make it so that functions like this are recorded in the trace as direct calls using the wrap()
API:
torch.fx.wrap('len') torch.fx.wrap('sqrt') traced = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(normalize) print(traced.code) """ import math def forward(self, x): len_1 = len(x) sqrt_1 = math.sqrt(len_1); len_1 = None truediv = x / sqrt_1; x = sqrt_1 = None return truediv """
Customizing Tracing with the Tracer
class
The Tracer
class is the class that underlies the implementation of symbolic_trace
. The behavior of tracing can be customized by subclassing Tracer, like so:
class MyCustomTracer(torch.fx.Tracer): # Inside here you can override various methods # to customize tracing. See the `Tracer` API # reference pass # Let's use this custom tracer to trace through this module class MyModule(torch.nn.Module): def forward(self, x): return torch.relu(x) + torch.ones(3, 4) mod = MyModule() traced_graph = MyCustomTracer().trace(mod) # trace() returns a Graph. Let's wrap it up in a # GraphModule to make it runnable traced = torch.fx.GraphModule(mod, traced_graph)
Leaf Modules
Leaf Modules are the modules that appear as calls in the symbolic trace rather than being traced through. The default set of leaf modules is the set of standard torch.nn
module instances. For example:
class MySpecialSubmodule(torch.nn.Module): def forward(self, x): return torch.neg(x) class MyModule(torch.nn.Module): def __init__(self): super().__init__() self.linear = torch.nn.Linear(3, 4) self.submod = MySpecialSubmodule() def forward(self, x): return self.submod(self.linear(x)) traced = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(MyModule()) print(traced.code) # `linear` is preserved as a call, yet `submod` is traced though. # This is because the default set of "Leaf Modules" includes all # standard `torch.nn` modules. """ import torch def forward(self, x): linear_1 = self.linear(x); x = None neg_1 = torch.neg(linear_1); linear_1 = None return neg_1 """
The set of leaf modules can be customized by overriding Tracer.is_leaf_module()
.
Miscellanea
-
Tensor constructors (e.g.
torch.zeros
,torch.ones
,torch.rand
,torch.randn
,torch.sparse_coo_tensor
) are currently not traceable.- The deterministic constructors (
zeros
,ones
) can be used and the value they produce will be embedded in the trace as a constant. This is only problematic if the arguments to these constructors refers to dynamic input sizes. In this case,ones_like
orzeros_like
may be a viable substitute. - Nondeterministic constructors (
rand
,randn
) will have a single random value embedded in the trace. This is likely not the intended behavior. - This behavior may be fixed in a future release.
- The deterministic constructors (
-
Type annotations
- Python 3-style type annotations (e.g.
func(x : torch.Tensor, y : int) -> torch.Tensor
) are supported and will be preserved by symbolic tracing. - Python 2-style comment type annotations
# type: (torch.Tensor, int) -> torch.Tensor
are not currently supported. - Annotations on local names within a function are not currently supported.
- Python 3-style type annotations (e.g.
API Reference
-
torch.fx.symbolic_trace(root, concrete_args=None)
[source] -
Symbolic tracing API
Given an
nn.Module
or function instanceroot
, this function will return aGraphModule
constructed by recording operations seen while tracing throughroot
.- Parameters
-
- root (Union[torch.nn.Module, Callable]) – Module or function to be traced and converted into a Graph representation.
- concrete_args (Optional[Dict[str, any]]) – Concrete arguments that should not be treated as Proxies.
- Returns
-
a Module created from the recorded operations from
root
. - Return type
-
torch.fx.wrap(fn_or_name)
[source] -
This function can be called at module-level scope to register fn_or_name as a “leaf function”. A “leaf function” will be preserved as a CallFunction node in the FX trace instead of being traced through:
# foo/bar/baz.py def my_custom_function(x, y): return x * x + y * y torch.fx.wrap('my_custom_function') def fn_to_be_traced(x, y): # When symbolic tracing, the below call to my_custom_function will be inserted into # the graph rather than tracing it. return my_custom_function(x, y)
This function can also equivalently be used as a decorator:
# foo/bar/baz.py @torch.fx.wrap def my_custom_function(x, y): return x * x + y * y
A wrapped function can be thought of a “leaf function”, analogous to the concept of “leaf modules”, that is, they are functions that are left as calls in the FX trace rather than traced through.
- Parameters
-
fn_or_name (Union[str, Callable]) – The function or name of the global function to insert into the graph when it’s called
-
class torch.fx.GraphModule(root, graph, class_name='GraphModule')
[source] -
GraphModule is an nn.Module generated from an fx.Graph. Graphmodule has a
graph
attribute, as well ascode
andforward
attributes generated from thatgraph
.Warning
When
graph
is reassigned,code
andforward
will be automatically regenerated. However, if you edit the contents of thegraph
without reassigning thegraph
attribute itself, you must callrecompile()
to update the generated code.-
__init__(root, graph, class_name='GraphModule')
[source] -
Construct a GraphModule.
- Parameters
-
-
root (Union[torch.nn.Module, Dict[str, Any]) –
root
can either be an nn.Module instance or a Dict mapping strings to any attribute type. In the case thatroot
is a Module, any references to Module-based objects (via qualified name) in the Graph’s Nodes’target
field will be copied over from the respective place withinroot
’s Module hierarchy into the GraphModule’s module hierarchy. In the case thatroot
is a dict, the qualified name found in a Node’starget
will be looked up directly in the dict’s keys. The object mapped to by the Dict will be copied over into the appropriate place within the GraphModule’s module hierarchy. -
graph (Graph) –
graph
contains the nodes this GraphModule should use for code generation -
name (str) –
name
denotes the name of this GraphModule for debugging purposes. If it’s unset, all error messages will report as originating fromGraphModule
. It may be helpful to set this toroot
’s original name or a name that makes sense within the context of your transform.
-
root (Union[torch.nn.Module, Dict[str, Any]) –
-
property code
-
Return the Python code generated from the
Graph
underlying thisGraphModule
.
-
property graph
-
Return the
Graph
underlying thisGraphModule
-
recompile()
[source] -
Recompile this GraphModule from its
graph
attribute. This should be called after editing the containedgraph
, otherwise the generated code of thisGraphModule
will be out of date.
-
to_folder(folder, module_name='FxModule')
[source] -
Dumps out module to
folder
withmodule_name
so that it can be imported withfrom <folder> import <module_name>
- Parameters
-
- folder (Union[str, os.PathLike]) – The folder to write the code out to
-
module_name (str) – Top-level name to use for the
Module
while writing out the code
-
-
class torch.fx.Graph
[source] -
Graph
is the main data structure used in the FX Intermediate Representation. It consists of a series ofNode
s, each representing callsites (or other syntactic constructs). The list ofNode
s, taken together, constitute a valid Python function.For example, the following code
import torch import torch.fx class MyModule(torch.nn.Module): def __init__(self): super().__init__() self.param = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.rand(3, 4)) self.linear = torch.nn.Linear(4, 5) def forward(self, x): return torch.topk(torch.sum(self.linear(x + self.linear.weight).relu(), dim=-1), 3) m = MyModule() gm = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(m)
Will produce the following Graph:
print(gm.graph)
graph(x): %linear_weight : [#users=1] = self.linear.weight %add_1 : [#users=1] = call_function[target=operator.add](args = (%x, %linear_weight), kwargs = {}) %linear_1 : [#users=1] = call_module[target=linear](args = (%add_1,), kwargs = {}) %relu_1 : [#users=1] = call_method[target=relu](args = (%linear_1,), kwargs = {}) %sum_1 : [#users=1] = call_function[target=torch.sum](args = (%relu_1,), kwargs = {dim: -1}) %topk_1 : [#users=1] = call_function[target=torch.topk](args = (%sum_1, 3), kwargs = {}) return topk_1
For the semantics of operations represented in the
Graph
, please seeNode
.-
__init__()
[source] -
Construct an empty Graph.
-
call_function(the_function, args=None, kwargs=None, type_expr=None)
[source] -
Insert a
call_function
Node
into theGraph
. Acall_function
node represents a call to a Python callable, specified bythe_function
.the_function
can be- Parameters
-
-
the_function (Callable[.., Any]) – The function to be called. Can be any PyTorch operator, Python function, or member of the
builtins
oroperator
namespaces. - args (Optional[Tuple[Argument, ..]]) – The positional arguments to be passed to the called function.
- kwargs (Optional[Dict[str, Argument]]) – The keyword arguments to be passed to the called function
- type_expr (Optional[Any]) – an optional type annotation representing the Python type the output of this node will have.
-
the_function (Callable[.., Any]) – The function to be called. Can be any PyTorch operator, Python function, or member of the
Returns
The newly created and inserted
call_function
node.Note
The same insertion point and type expression rules apply for this method as
Graph.create_node()
.
-
call_method(method_name, args=None, kwargs=None, type_expr=None)
[source] -
Insert a
call_method
Node
into theGraph
. Acall_method
node represents a call to a given method on the 0th element ofargs
.- Parameters
-
-
method_name (str) – The name of the method to apply to the self argument. For example, if args[0] is a
Node
representing aTensor
, then to callrelu()
on thatTensor
, passrelu
tomethod_name
. -
args (Optional[Tuple[Argument, ..]]) – The positional arguments to be passed to the called method. Note that this should include a
self
argument. - kwargs (Optional[Dict[str, Argument]]) – The keyword arguments to be passed to the called method
- type_expr (Optional[Any]) – an optional type annotation representing the Python type the output of this node will have.
-
method_name (str) – The name of the method to apply to the self argument. For example, if args[0] is a
- Returns
-
The newly created and inserted
call_method
node.
Note
The same insertion point and type expression rules apply for this method as
Graph.create_node()
.
-
call_module(module_name, args=None, kwargs=None, type_expr=None)
[source] -
Insert a
call_module
Node
into theGraph
. Acall_module
node represents a call to the forward() function of aModule
in theModule
hierarchy.- Parameters
-
-
module_name (str) – The qualified name of the
Module
in theModule
hierarchy to be called. For example, if the tracedModule
has a submodule namedfoo
, which has a submodule namedbar
, the qualified namefoo.bar
should be passed asmodule_name
to call that module. -
args (Optional[Tuple[Argument, ..]]) – The positional arguments to be passed to the called method. Note that this should not include a
self
argument. - kwargs (Optional[Dict[str, Argument]]) – The keyword arguments to be passed to the called method
- type_expr (Optional[Any]) – an optional type annotation representing the Python type the output of this node will have.
-
module_name (str) – The qualified name of the
- Returns
-
The newly-created and inserted
call_module
node.
Note
The same insertion point and type expression rules apply for this method as
Graph.create_node()
.
-
create_node(op, target, args=None, kwargs=None, name=None, type_expr=None)
[source] -
Create a
Node
and add it to theGraph
at the current insert-point. Note that the current insert-point can be set viaGraph.inserting_before()
andGraph.inserting_after()
.- Parameters
-
-
op (str) – the opcode for this Node. One of ‘call_function’, ‘call_method’, ‘get_attr’, ‘call_module’, ‘placeholder’, or ‘output’. The semantics of these opcodes are described in the
Graph
docstring. - args (Optional[Tuple[Argument, ..]]) – is a tuple of arguments to this node.
- kwargs (Optional[Dict[str, Argument]]) – the kwargs of this Node
-
name (Optional[str]) – an optional string name for the
Node
. This will influence the name of the value assigned to in the Python generated code. - type_expr (Optional[Any]) – an optional type annotation representing the Python type the output of this node will have.
-
op (str) – the opcode for this Node. One of ‘call_function’, ‘call_method’, ‘get_attr’, ‘call_module’, ‘placeholder’, or ‘output’. The semantics of these opcodes are described in the
- Returns
-
The newly-created and inserted node.
-
erase_node(to_erase)
[source] -
Erases a
Node
from theGraph
. Throws an exception if there are still users of that node in theGraph
.- Parameters
-
to_erase (Node) – The
Node
to erase from theGraph
.
-
get_attr(qualified_name, type_expr=None)
[source] -
Insert a
get_attr
node into the Graph. Aget_attr
Node
represents the fetch of an attribute from theModule
hierarchy.- Parameters
-
-
qualified_name (str) – the fully-qualified name of the attribute to be retrieved. For example, if the traced Module has a submodule named
foo
, which has a submodule namedbar
, which has an attribute namedbaz
, the qualified namefoo.bar.baz
should be passed asqualified_name
. - type_expr (Optional[Any]) – an optional type annotation representing the Python type the output of this node will have.
-
qualified_name (str) – the fully-qualified name of the attribute to be retrieved. For example, if the traced Module has a submodule named
- Returns
-
The newly-created and inserted
get_attr
node.
Note
The same insertion point and type expression rules apply for this method as
Graph.create_node
.
-
graph_copy(g, val_map)
[source] -
Copy all nodes from a given graph into
self
.- Parameters
- Returns
-
The value in
self
that is now equivalent to the output value ing
, ifg
had anoutput
node.None
otherwise.
-
inserting_after(n=None)
[source] -
Set the point at which create_node and companion methods will insert into the graph. When used within a ‘with’ statement, this will temporary set the insert point and then restore it when the with statement exits:
with g.inserting_after(n): ... # inserting after node n ... # insert point restored to what it was previously g.inserting_after(n) # set the insert point permanently
- Parameters
-
n (Optional[Node]) – The node before which to insert. If None this will insert after the beginning of the entire graph.
- Returns
-
A resource manager that will restore the insert point on
__exit__
.
-
inserting_before(n=None)
[source] -
Set the point at which create_node and companion methods will insert into the graph. When used within a ‘with’ statement, this will temporary set the insert point and then restore it when the with statement exits:
with g.inserting_before(n): ... # inserting before node n ... # insert point restored to what it was previously g.inserting_before(n) # set the insert point permanently
- Parameters
-
n (Optional[Node]) – The node before which to insert. If None this will insert before the beginning of the entire graph.
- Returns
-
A resource manager that will restore the insert point on
__exit__
.
-
lint(root=None)
[source] -
Runs various checks on this Graph to make sure it is well-formed. In particular: - Checks Nodes have correct ownership (owned by this graph) - Checks Nodes appear in topological order - If
root
is provided, checks that targets exist inroot
- Parameters
-
root (Optional[torch.nn.Module]) – The root module with which to check for targets. This is equivalent to the
root
argument that is passed when constructing aGraphModule
.
-
node_copy(node, arg_transform=<function Graph.<lambda>>)
[source] -
Copy a node from one graph into another.
arg_transform
needs to transform arguments from the graph of node to the graph of self. Example:# Copying all the nodes in `g` into `new_graph` g : torch.fx.Graph = ... new_graph = torch.fx.graph() value_remap = {} for node in g.nodes: value_remap[node] = new_graph.node_copy(node, lambda n : value_remap[n])
- Parameters
-
-
node (Node) – The node to copy into
self
. -
arg_transform (Callable[[Node], Argument]) – A function that transforms
Node
arguments in node’sargs
andkwargs
into the equivalent argument inself
. In the simplest case, this should retrieve a value out of a table mapping Nodes in the original graph toself
.
-
node (Node) – The node to copy into
-
property nodes
-
Get the list of Nodes that constitute this Graph.
Note that this
Node
list representation is a doubly-linked list. Mutations during iteration (e.g. delete a Node, add a Node) are safe.- Returns
-
A doubly-linked list of Nodes. Note that
reversed
can be called on this list to switch iteration order.
-
output(result, type_expr=None)
[source] -
Insert an
output
Node
into theGraph
. Anoutput
node represents areturn
statement in Python code.result
is the value that should be returned.- Parameters
-
- result (Argument) – The value to be returned.
- type_expr (Optional[Any]) – an optional type annotation representing the Python type the output of this node will have.
Note
The same insertion point and type expression rules apply for this method as
Graph.create_node
.
-
placeholder(name, type_expr=None)
[source] -
Insert a
placeholder
node into the Graph. Aplaceholder
represents a function input.- Parameters
-
-
name (str) – A name for the input value. This corresponds to the name of the positional argument to the function this
Graph
represents. - type_expr (Optional[Any]) – an optional type annotation representing the Python type the output of this node will have. This is needed in some cases for proper code generation (e.g. when the function is used subsequently in TorchScript compilation).
-
name (str) – A name for the input value. This corresponds to the name of the positional argument to the function this
Note
The same insertion point and type expression rules apply for this method as
Graph.create_node
.
-
print_tabular()
[source] -
Prints the intermediate representation of the graph in tabular format.
-
-
class torch.fx.Node(graph, name, op, target, args, kwargs, type=None)
[source] -
Node
is the data structure that represents individual operations within aGraph
. For the most part, Nodes represent callsites to various entities, such as operators, methods, and Modules (some exceptions include nodes that specify function inputs and outputs). EachNode
has a function specified by itsop
property. TheNode
semantics for each value ofop
are as follows:-
placeholder
represents a function input. Thename
attribute specifies the name this value will take on.target
is similarly the name of the argument.args
holds either: 1) nothing, or 2) a single argument denoting the default parameter of the function input.kwargs
is don’t-care. Placeholders correspond to the function parameters (e.g.x
) in the graph printout. -
get_attr
retrieves a parameter from the module hierarchy.name
is similarly the name the result of the fetch is assigned to.target
is the fully-qualified name of the parameter’s position in the module hierarchy.args
andkwargs
are don’t-care -
call_function
applies a free function to some values.name
is similarly the name of the value to assign to.target
is the function to be applied.args
andkwargs
represent the arguments to the function, following the Python calling convention -
call_module
applies a module in the module hierarchy’sforward()
method to given arguments.name
is as previous.target
is the fully-qualified name of the module in the module hierarchy to call.args
andkwargs
represent the arguments to invoke the module on, including the self argument. -
call_method
calls a method on a value.name
is as similar.target
is the string name of the method to apply to theself
argument.args
andkwargs
represent the arguments to invoke the module on, including the self argument -
output
contains the output of the traced function in itsargs[0]
attribute. This corresponds to the “return” statement in the Graph printout.
-
property all_input_nodes
-
Return all Nodes that are inputs to this Node. This is equivalent to iterating over
args
andkwargs
and only collecting the values that are Nodes.- Returns
-
List of
Nodes
that appear in theargs
andkwargs
of thisNode
, in that order.
-
append(x)
[source] -
Insert x after this node in the list of nodes in the graph. Equvalent to
self.next.prepend(x)
- Parameters
-
x (Node) – The node to put after this node. Must be a member of the same graph.
-
property args
-
The tuple of arguments to this
Node
. The interpretation of arguments depends on the node’s opcode. See theNode
docstring for more information.Assignment to this property is allowed. All accounting of uses and users is updated automatically on assignment.
-
property kwargs
-
The dict of keyword arguments to this
Node
. The interpretation of arguments depends on the node’s opcode. See theNode
docstring for more information.Assignment to this property is allowed. All accounting of uses and users is updated automatically on assignment.
-
property next
-
Returns the next
Node
in the linked list of Nodes.- Returns
-
The next
Node
in the linked list of Nodes.
-
prepend(x)
[source] -
Insert x before this node in the list of nodes in the graph. Example:
Before: p -> self bx -> x -> ax After: p -> x -> self bx -> ax
- Parameters
-
x (Node) – The node to put before this node. Must be a member of the same graph.
-
property prev
-
Returns the previous
Node
in the linked list of Nodes.- Returns
-
The previous
Node
in the linked list of Nodes.
-
-
class torch.fx.Tracer(autowrap_modules=(<module 'math' from '/home/matti/miniconda3/lib/python3.7/lib-dynload/math.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so'>, ))
[source] -
Tracer
is the class that implements the symbolic tracing functionality oftorch.fx.symbolic_trace
. A call tosymbolic_trace(m)
is equivalent toTracer().trace(m)
.Tracer can be subclassed to override various behaviors of the tracing process. The different behaviors that can be overridden are described in the docstrings of the methods on this class.
-
call_module(m, forward, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Method that specifies the behavior of this
Tracer
when it encounters a call to annn.Module
instance.By default, the behavior is to check if the called module is a leaf module via
is_leaf_module
. If it is, emit acall_module
node referring tom
in theGraph
. Otherwise, call theModule
normally, tracing through the operations in itsforward
function.This method can be overridden to–for example–create nested traced GraphModules, or any other behavior you would want while tracing across
Module
boundaries.Module
boundaries.- Parameters
-
- m (Module) – The module for which a call is being emitted
-
forward (Callable) – The forward() method of the
Module
to be invoked - args (Tuple) – args of the module callsite
- kwargs (Dict) – kwargs of the module callsite
- Returns
-
The return value from the Module call. In the case that a
call_module
node was emitted, this is aProxy
value. Otherwise, it is whatever value was returned from theModule
invocation.
-
create_arg(a)
[source] -
A method to specify the behavior of tracing when preparing values to be used as arguments to nodes in the
Graph
.By default, the behavior includes:
- Iterate through collection types (e.g. tuple, list, dict) and recursively call
create_args
on the elements. - Given a Proxy object, return a reference to the underlying IR
Node
-
Given a non-Proxy Tensor object, emit IR for various cases:
- For a Parameter, emit a
get_attr
node referring to that Parameter - For a non-Parameter Tensor, store the Tensor away in a special attribute referring to that attribute.
- For a Parameter, emit a
This method can be overridden to support more types.
- Parameters
-
a (Any) – The value to be emitted as an
Argument
in theGraph
. - Returns
-
The value
a
converted into the appropriateArgument
- Iterate through collection types (e.g. tuple, list, dict) and recursively call
-
create_args_for_root(root_fn, is_module, concrete_args=None)
[source] -
Create
placeholder
nodes corresponding to the signature of theroot
Module. This method introspects root’s signature and emits those nodes accordingly, also supporting*args
and**kwargs
.
-
is_leaf_module(m, module_qualified_name)
[source] -
A method to specify whether a given
nn.Module
is a “leaf” module.Leaf modules are the atomic units that appear in the IR, referenced by
call_module
calls. By default, Modules in the PyTorch standard library namespace (torch.nn) are leaf modules. All other modules are traced through and their constituent ops are recorded, unless specified otherwise via this parameter.- Parameters
-
path_of_module(mod)
[source] -
Helper method to find the qualified name of
mod
in the Module hierarchy ofroot
. For example, ifroot
has a submodule namedfoo
, which has a submodule namedbar
, passingbar
into this function will return the string “foo.bar”.- Parameters
-
mod (str) – The
Module
to retrieve the qualified name for.
-
trace(root, concrete_args=None)
[source] -
Trace
root
and return the corresponding FXGraph
representation.root
can either be annn.Module
instance or a Python callable.Note that after this call,
self.root
may be different from theroot
passed in here. For example, when a free function is passed totrace()
, we will create annn.Module
instance to use as the root and add embedded constants to.- Parameters
-
root (Union[Module, Callable]) – Either a
Module
or a function to be traced through. - Returns
-
A
Graph
representing the semantics of the passed-inroot
.
-
-
class torch.fx.Proxy(node, tracer=None)
[source] -
Proxy
objects areNode
wrappers that flow through the program during symbolic tracing and record all the operations (torch
function calls, method calls, operators) that they touch into the growing FX Graph.If you’re doing graph transforms, you can wrap your own
Proxy
method around a rawNode
so that you can use the overloaded operators to add additional things to aGraph
.
-
class torch.fx.Interpreter(module)
[source] -
An Interpreter executes an FX graph Node-by-Node. This pattern can be useful for many things, including writing code transformations as well as analysis passes.
Methods in the Interpreter class can be overridden to customize the behavior of execution. The map of overrideable methods in terms of call hierarchy:
run() +-- run_node +-- placeholder() +-- get_attr() +-- call_function() +-- call_method() +-- call_module() +-- output()
Example
Suppose we want to swap all instances of
torch.neg
withtorch.sigmoid
and vice versa (including theirTensor
method equivalents). We could subclass Interpreter like so:class NegSigmSwapInterpreter(Interpreter): def call_function(self, target : Target, args : Tuple, kwargs : Dict) -> Any: if target == torch.sigmoid: return torch.neg(*args, **kwargs) return super().call_function(n) def call_method(self, target : Target, args : Tuple, kwargs : Dict) -> Any: if target == 'neg': call_self, *args_tail = args return call_self.sigmoid(*args_tail, **kwargs) return super().call_method(n) def fn(x): return torch.sigmoid(x).neg() gm = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(fn) input = torch.randn(3, 4) result = NegSigmSwapInterpreter(gm).run(input) torch.testing.assert_allclose(result, torch.neg(input).sigmoid())
- Parameters
-
module (GraphModule) – The module to be executed
-
call_function(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute a
call_function
node and return the result.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
- Return
-
Any: The value returned by the function invocation
-
call_method(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute a
call_method
node and return the result.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
- Return
-
Any: The value returned by the method invocation
-
call_module(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute a
call_module
node and return the result.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
- Return
-
Any: The value returned by the module invocation
-
fetch_args_kwargs_from_env(n)
[source] -
Fetch the concrete values of
args
andkwargs
of noden
from the current execution environment.- Parameters
-
n (Node) – The node for which
args
andkwargs
should be fetched. - Returns
-
args
andkwargs
with concrete values forn
. - Return type
-
Tuple[Tuple, Dict]
-
fetch_attr(target)
[source] -
Fetch an attribute from the
Module
hierarchy ofself.module
.- Parameters
-
target (str) – The fully-qualfiied name of the attribute to fetch
- Returns
-
The value of the attribute.
- Return type
-
Any
-
get_attr(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute a
get_attr
node. Will retrieve an attribute value from theModule
hierarchy ofself.module
.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
- Returns
-
The value of the attribute that was retrieved
- Return type
-
Any
-
map_nodes_to_values(args, n)
[source] -
Recursively descend through
args
and look up the concrete value for eachNode
in the current execution environment.- Parameters
-
- args (Argument) – Data structure within which to look up concrete values
-
n (Node) – Node to which
args
belongs. This is only used for error reporting.
-
output(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute an
output
node. This really just retrieves the value referenced by theoutput
node and returns it.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
- Returns
-
The return value referenced by the output node
- Return type
-
Any
-
placeholder(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute a
placeholder
node. Note that this is stateful:Interpreter
maintains an internal iterator over arguments passed torun
and this method returns next() on that iterator.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
- Returns
-
The argument value that was retrieved.
- Return type
-
Any
-
run(*args, initial_env=None)
[source] -
Run
module
via interpretation and return the result.- Parameters
-
- *args – The arguments to the Module to run, in positional order
-
initial_env (Optional[Dict[Node, Any]]) – An optional starting environment for execution. This is a dict mapping
Node
to any value. This can be used, for example, to pre-populate results for certainNodes
so as to do only partial evaluation within the interpreter.
- Returns
-
The value returned from executing the Module
- Return type
-
Any
-
class torch.fx.Transformer(module)
[source] -
Transformer
is a special type of interpreter that produces a newModule
. It exposes atransform()
method that returns the transformedModule
.Transformer
does not require arguments to run, asInterpreter
does.Transformer
works entirely symbolically.Example
Suppose we want to swap all instances of
torch.neg
withtorch.sigmoid
and vice versa (including theirTensor
method equivalents). We could subclassTransformer
like so:class NegSigmSwapXformer(Transformer): def call_function(self, target : 'Target', args : Tuple[Argument, ...], kwargs : Dict[str, Any]) -> Any: if target == torch.sigmoid: return torch.neg(*args, **kwargs) return super().call_function(n) def call_method(self, target : 'Target', args : Tuple[Argument, ...], kwargs : Dict[str, Any]) -> Any: if target == 'neg': call_self, *args_tail = args return call_self.sigmoid(*args_tail, **kwargs) return super().call_method(n) def fn(x): return torch.sigmoid(x).neg() gm = torch.fx.symbolic_trace(fn) transformed : torch.nn.Module = NegSigmSwapXformer(gm).transform() input = torch.randn(3, 4) torch.testing.assert_allclose(transformed(input), torch.neg(input).sigmoid())
- Parameters
-
module (GraphModule) – The
Module
to be transformed.
-
get_attr(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute a
get_attr
node. InTransformer
, this is overridden to insert a newget_attr
node into the output graph.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
-
placeholder(target, args, kwargs)
[source] -
Execute a
placeholder
node. InTransformer
, this is overridden to insert a newplaceholder
into the output graph.- Parameters
-
- target (Target) – The call target for this node. See Node for details on semantics
- args (Tuple) – Tuple of positional args for this invocation
- kwargs (Dict) – Dict of keyword arguments for this invocation
-
transform()
[source] -
Transform
self.module
and return the transformedGraphModule
.
-
torch.fx.replace_pattern(gm, pattern, replacement)
[source] -
Matches all possible non-overlapping sets of operators and their data dependencies (
pattern
) in the Graph of a GraphModule (gm
), then replaces each of these matched subgraphs with another subgraph (replacement
).- Parameters
-
- gm – The GraphModule that wraps the Graph to operate on
-
pattern – The subgraph to match in
gm
for replacement -
replacement – The subgraph to replace
pattern
with
- Returns
-
A list of
Match
objects representing the places in the original graph thatpattern
was matched to. The list is empty if there are no matches.Match
is defined as:class Match(NamedTuple): # Node from which the match was found anchor: Node # Maps nodes in the pattern subgraph to nodes in the larger graph nodes_map: Dict[Node, Node]
- Return type
-
List[Match]
Examples:
import torch from torch.fx import symbolic_trace, subgraph_rewriter class M(torch.nn.Module): def __init__(self): super().__init__() def forward(self, x, w1, w2): m1 = torch.cat([w1, w2]).sum() m2 = torch.cat([w1, w2]).sum() return x + torch.max(m1) + torch.max(m2) def pattern(w1, w2): return torch.cat([w1, w2]).sum() def replacement(w1, w2): return torch.stack([w1, w2]) traced_module = symbolic_trace(M()) subgraph_rewriter.replace_pattern(traced_module, pattern, replacement)
The above code will first match
pattern
in theforward
method oftraced_module
. Pattern-matching is done based on use-def relationships, not node names. For example, if you hadp = torch.cat([a, b])
inpattern
, you could matchm = torch.cat([a, b])
in the originalforward
function, despite the variable names being different (p
vsm
).The
return
statement inpattern
is matched based on its value only; it may or may not match to thereturn
statement in the larger graph. In other words, the pattern doesn’t have to extend to the end of the larger graph.When the pattern is matched, it will be removed from the larger function and replaced by
replacement
. If there are multiple matches forpattern
in the larger function, each non-overlapping match will be replaced. In the case of a match overlap, the first found match in the set of overlapping matches will be replaced. (“First” here being defined as the first in a topological ordering of the Nodes’ use-def relationships. In most cases, the first Node is the parameter that appears directly afterself
, while the last Node is whatever the function returns.)One important thing to note is that the parameters of the
pattern
Callable must be used in the Callable itself, and the parameters of thereplacement
Callable must match the pattern. The first rule is why, in the above code block, theforward
function has parametersx, w1, w2
, but thepattern
function only has parametersw1, w2
.pattern
doesn’t usex
, so it shouldn’t specifyx
as a parameter. As an example of the second rule, consider replacingdef pattern(x, y): return torch.neg(x) + torch.relu(y)
with
def replacement(x, y): return torch.relu(x)
In this case,
replacement
needs the same number of parameters aspattern
(bothx
andy
), even though the parametery
isn’t used inreplacement
.After calling
subgraph_rewriter.replace_pattern
, the generated Python code looks like this:def forward(self, x, w1, w2): stack_1 = torch.stack([w1, w2]) sum_1 = stack_1.sum() stack_2 = torch.stack([w1, w2]) sum_2 = stack_2.sum() max_1 = torch.max(sum_1) add_1 = x + max_1 max_2 = torch.max(sum_2) add_2 = add_1 + max_2 return add_2
© 2019 Torch Contributors
Licensed under the 3-clause BSD License.
https://pytorch.org/docs/1.8.0/fx.html